Tag Archives: the Internet

Christmas On the Internet

I love everything about the Christmas season. I love going to the mall and buying presents, seeing everything decorated, Christmas music (my Christmas playlist has over 160 songs on it), the TV specials and movies, making Christmas cookies, everything. I can’t wait until we get a good amount of snow so that it looks more like Christmas.

I realize I sound like an over-earnest loser, but I don’t care. This is one thing about myself I hope never changes. I know there are plenty of reasons to stress out over the holidays and that those reasons increase as you get older and have children, but I hope I’m always able to look past them. It’s only a small portion of the year, and we need to enjoy it while it lasts.

Okay, I’m done with that. Moving on- in previous years, I’ve blogged about Christmas on the radio and Christmas on TV. What’s left? Why, of course- the Internet!

Here’s “The Christmas Tree.” This guy does a lot of videos with a wig, dark glasses, and a thick New York accent. I think he’s imitating his mother. My sister showed me this last Christmas, and at first I didn’t think it was that funny, but the more I watched it, the more I liked it.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RTs5eKZ0i1E&w=420&h=315]

The title of this one makes it sound sketchy, but it’s not- just hilarious. David Sedaris’s “Six to Eight Black Men” tells about some strange Christmas traditions in the Netherlands (and how it’s legal for the blind to hunt in Michigan). Scroll down a bit to hear Sedaris’s own reading of Six to Eight Black Men.

And finally, a word from my girls Garfunkel and Oates, on the phenomenon known as “Present Face,” which has befallen all of us when we get an unwanted gift.

[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VFFgbbUt1jY&w=420&h=315]

The Series Section

“If Regina George is Cokie Mason, then Gretchen Weiners is Grace Blume. Think about it.”

If you understood that sentence, get yourself to What Claudia Wore, stat.

Recently, I’ve noticed an increasing number of blogs dedicated to the 90s phenomenon I like to call “the series section.” There still are, and always will be, book series for middle grade readers and young adults— Harry Potter, Twilight, and Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants have been a few this decade—but the days of the mega-series, when you recognized books by their numbers along with their titles, when ghostwriters helped ensure that one book a month came out, when the Barnes & Noble in Nashua had rows and rows containing every book in the Baby-Sitters Club and Sweet Valley Twins in a section labeled “Young Adults Series,” seem to be behind us. Sadly, most of those books, which I’d spend whatever money I had on, spend hours browsing in said Nashua Barnes & Noble, and beg for in groups of ten whenever it was Christmas or my birthday, are no longer in print.

So thank God for blogs like What Claudia Wore, The Dairi Burger, The Unicorner, and Sleepover Friends Forever, which exist to remind us what a loss this is to the world of children’s literature. I remember these books the same way I remember Titanic—as fun as it is to frequent the blogs that snark on them, wondering how many times the BSC could possibly be in eighth grade, what Claudia would have been like if she’d grown up in the age of spell check, and why everyone always just put up with Kristy’s bitching about them getting to the meetings at 5:30 on the dot, these were the books that helped ensure that I loved reading throughout my preteens. Kids today had Harry Potter, which was only seven books long and, of course, is over now, but I could always look forward to a new Baby-Sitters Club or Sweet Valley Twins book. They made for cheap but much-appreciated birthday gifts in fourth and fifth grade. I’d bond with my friends over them (“Ooh, have you read this one yet?”). And, as I’ve mentioned before, books were often how I dealt with my own feelings—if I had a fight with my friends, got embarrassed in gym class, or was being made fun of at school, I’d seek out a book about a kid going through something similar, and book series always dealt with a wide range of topics.

But enough of this serious talk. You know you loved those books, too. Reminisce with me, will you?

The Baby-Sitters Club
Kristy was the one who had the “great idea” to start the club. She was short, coached softball, had a rich stepfather and a stepsister who got her own book series (Baby-Sitters Little Sister, which was what introduced me to the BSC), bossed everyone around, and bitched everyone out if they got to the meetings even a minute late. For some reason, no one ever told her to shut up.

Claudia was Japanese-American and an artist and had eating habits almost as bad as her spelling. She had a genius older sister and parents who were on her case about her junk food, her penchant for Nancy Drew, and her bad grades—but they did let her have her own phone line, which was why the meetings were at her house. Entire paragraphs in the second chapter of every book were dedicated to her outfits. Now, so are entire blogs.

Mary Anne cried a lot. Like, a lot. She was really shy, her mother was dead, and her father eventually married Dawn’s mother. She had a cute boyfriend named Logan who had a Southern accent and became an associate club member. Everyone was very upset when she got a haircut.

Stacey was a New York stereotype whose books were like a PSA for type 1 diabetes.

Dawn was a California stereotype who couldn’t make up her mind about which coast she wanted to live on.

Mallory was eleven, completely awkward, a writer, a horse-lover, and the oldest of eight kids. So of course, minus the eight kids part, she was the one I related to the most easily.

Jessi was black! Which they felt the need to mention every chapter! And she was also a ballerina. Who was black!

Abby didn’t show up until about book 90, so a lot of people forget about her. If you need a refresher, she was funny, athletic, and Jewish and had a twin sister, a dead father, and asthma. She also occasionally talked back to Kristy. It only took 90 books for someone to do it.

Together, they baby-sat a lot of cute kids, like the adorable Jamie Newton, Stacey’s “almost-sister” Charlotte Johansson, bratty Jenny Prezzioso, and “walking disaster” Jackie Rodowsky. They wrote about their jobs in the club notebook. They met every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 5:30 to 6:00. And they were the best.friends.ever.

God, I loved The Baby-Sitters Club. I read just about every book in the series not once but several times. After awhile, they didn’t even fit on my bookshelves. When I was nine, my entire room was decorated with posters and memorabilia I got from the Baby-Sitters Club fan club. My friends and I dreamed of the day we’d start our own baby-sitters club (of course, it never happened). When the movie came out in 1995, I wore my Baby-Sitters Club T-shirt and hat to the theater on the first day it came out. Actually, my cousins’ aunt, who works for Scholastic, was the executive producer of the movie, and when she got me Ann M. Martin’s autograph when I was ten, it was pretty much the best day of my life at the time.

Yeah, I think you get the picture. I was a huuuuuuuge fan.

Sweet Valley Twins
Sweet Valley High came first, and there was also Sweet Valley Kids, which had the same characters in second grade. But Sweet Valley Twins (later retitled Sweet Valley Twins and Friends, since it wasn’t just about the Wakefields) was the series I read the most. It was centered around the titular twins, Elizabeth and Jessica Wakefield, who were identically blonde and pretty but, of course, polar opposites personality-wise. Elizabeth was the school newspaper editor, had perfect grades, and was obnoxiously self-righteous. Jessica was popularity-obsessed, a member of the Unicorn Club (which was basically a group of popular girls sitting around congratulating themselves on how awesome they were), and obnoxiously self-centered. They were twelve-year-old sixth graders in Sweet Valley, California, which must have one hell of a public transportation system, since these middle schoolers were somehow able to get around by themselves incredibly easily. Speaking of which:

Sleepover Friends
Man, I loved sleepovers as a kid. My mom, who thought they made me tired and cranky, was not such a fan. But what sleepover-loving pre-teen wouldn’t love reading a whole book series about friends who sleep over at each other’s houses every Friday night?

Enter the Sleepover Friends. They were ten-and eleven-year-old fifth graders in Riverhurst, USA, a suburb of “The City,” which was never identified further than that. Lauren, who narrated most of the books (eventually, the other three girls started narrating some of them), was athletic and loved food. Kate was the Kristy Thomas of the group—short, bossy, and would bitch you out if you talked during a movie. Patti, formerly of The City, was the smart, shy one. Stephanie, also formerly of The City, only dressed in red, black, and white because she thought it was cool and probably went on to have an eating disorder, since she was concerned about getting fat even at age ten. They’d get together on Fridays, make food, play Truth or Dare, listen to the radio, make fun of their classmates. And like Sweet Valley, Riverhurst was apparently very easy to get around, because these girls, who weren’t even in middle school yet, seemed to have no trouble going anywhere by themselves without any adults.

The Gymnasts
I used to want to be a gymnast, but not enough to take gymnastics classes. Only enough to do round-offs and one-handed cartwheels on the field at recess and to use the edge of my sandbox like a balance beam. So of course I loved this series, which was about a group of girls on a gymnastics team called the Pinecones at Evergreen Gymnastics Academy (geddit?). It was mainly focused on Lauren, Cindi, Jodi, and Darlene. Lauren was smart but not great at gymnastics, although in the end she turned out to be a good vaulter. Cindi was Lauren’s best friend and was good at the bars. Darlene was the captain, and her dad was a football player nicknamed Big Beef. Jodi was blonde and had a bit of a temper and had a mom who’d recently remarried. The four of them usually took turns narrating the books, except for one that was narrated by Ti An, the youngest member of their team, and two that were narrated by Heidi, an elite gymnast and recovering anorexic they sometimes hung out with. Heidi won an Olympic gold medal in Barcelona in the completely unrealistic series finale. The Pinecones had a really cool coach named Patrick, whom Lauren had a crush on. And let’s not forget about the enemies: Becky, the requisite bitchy girl who was a level higher than the Pinecones; Ashley, the bratty younger Pinecone who never got her own book; and the team’s big rivals, the Atomic Amazons. I remember Lauren always used to preface every statement she made with, “It’s a proven fact.” One of them was, “It’s a proven fact that pigs don’t sweat,” in response to someone using the phrase, “Sweating like a pig.”

Fear Street
R. L. Stine had the Goosebumps series for younger kids, but this was the series I read. Entertainment has never really scared me, and neither did these books, but it’s kind of amazing that these were marketed to pre-teens. There’s no sex in any of them, but there are tons of graphic, bloody murders. All of them took place in Shadyside, USA, which sounds like an ordinary suburb with a ridiculously high crime rate. It’s amazing anyone wanted to live there. Occasionally, there would be small cameos by characters mentioned in another book, but for the most part, every book was about someone different. A lot of them were surprisingly well-plotted—the killer usually turned out to be the least likely person, like the main character’s best friend, or the prom queen candidate who faked her own death and then began killing all the other prom queen candidates because she thought they were trying to steal her boyfriend (seriously). Mostly, they were just murder mysteries, but some were about something supernatural, like cheerleaders getting possessed by an evil spirit, a “ghost from the future” who comes back to try to prevent his own death, or some weird “mind transfer tape” of chanting by some primitive tribe that allowed this guy to possess his girlfriend’s body and make her kill people. I remember there was also a series of books that tried to explain the beginnings of Fear Street, starting in Puritan times when an innocent girl was burned at the stake for witchcraft in a frightening display of historical inaccuracy.

Lurlene McDaniel
This wasn’t a series so much as an author franchise. Lurlene McDaniel wrote a ton of books about teenagers dying of cancer, and when I was about twelve, I couldn’t get enough of these romanticized depictions of illness. They were all so formulaic—if there was a teenage couple, one of them would not survive. If the teenager with cancer survived the book, she probably would die in the sequel, or at least someone close to her would. Lather, rinse, repeat. I’d read these for the same reason I watch The Notebook, but I think also because they helped put middle school problems in perspective.

I remember plenty of other series, complete with the numbers, that I didn’t read too many of. For the little girls dreaming of becoming professional dancers, there was Ballet School for the younger crowd and Satin Slippers for older kids. There was also another series about gymnasts called American Gold Gymnasts, and I think those gymnasts were kids who actually had a shot at the Olympics. And then there was Girl Talk, which was about…a bunch of girls talking? Four girls in a middle school, I think.

There still are, and continue to be, some fabulous children’s and young adult books out there. But it looks like the series section is gone for good. Thanks for the memories.

The Series Section

“If Regina George is Cokie Mason, then Gretchen Weiners is Grace Blume. Think about it.”

If you understood that sentence, get yourself to What Claudia Wore, stat.

Recently, I’ve noticed an increasing number of blogs dedicated to the 90s phenomenon I like to call “the series section.” There still are, and always will be, book series for middle grade readers and young adults— Harry Potter, Twilight, and Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants have been a few this decade—but the days of the mega-series, when you recognized books by their numbers along with their titles, when ghostwriters helped ensure that one book a month came out, when the Barnes & Noble in Nashua had rows and rows containing every book in the Baby-Sitters Club and Sweet Valley Twins in a section labeled “Young Adults Series,” seem to be behind us. Sadly, most of those books, which I’d spend whatever money I had on, spend hours browsing in said Nashua Barnes & Noble, and beg for in groups of ten whenever it was Christmas or my birthday, are no longer in print.

So thank God for blogs like What Claudia Wore, The Dairi Burger, The Unicorner, and Sleepover Friends Forever, which exist to remind us what a loss this is to the world of children’s literature. I remember these books the same way I remember Titanic—as fun as it is to frequent the blogs that snark on them, wondering how many times the BSC could possibly be in eighth grade, what Claudia would have been like if she’d grown up in the age of spell check, and why everyone always just put up with Kristy’s bitching about them getting to the meetings at 5:30 on the dot, these were the books that helped ensure that I loved reading throughout my preteens. Kids today had Harry Potter, which was only seven books long and, of course, is over now, but I could always look forward to a new Baby-Sitters Club or Sweet Valley Twins book. They made for cheap but much-appreciated birthday gifts in fourth and fifth grade. I’d bond with my friends over them (“Ooh, have you read this one yet?”). And, as I’ve mentioned before, books were often how I dealt with my own feelings—if I had a fight with my friends, got embarrassed in gym class, or was being made fun of at school, I’d seek out a book about a kid going through something similar, and book series always dealt with a wide range of topics.

But enough of this serious talk. You know you loved those books, too. Reminisce with me, will you?

The Baby-Sitters Club
Kristy was the one who had the “great idea” to start the club. She was short, coached softball, had a rich stepfather and a stepsister who got her own book series (Baby-Sitters Little Sister, which was what introduced me to the BSC), bossed everyone around, and bitched everyone out if they got to the meetings even a minute late. For some reason, no one ever told her to shut up.

Claudia was Japanese-American and an artist and had eating habits almost as bad as her spelling. She had a genius older sister and parents who were on her case about her junk food, her penchant for Nancy Drew, and her bad grades—but they did let her have her own phone line, which was why the meetings were at her house. Entire paragraphs in the second chapter of every book were dedicated to her outfits. Now, so are entire blogs.

Mary Anne cried a lot. Like, a lot. She was really shy, her mother was dead, and her father eventually married Dawn’s mother. She had a cute boyfriend named Logan who had a Southern accent and became an associate club member. Everyone was very upset when she got a haircut.

Stacey was a New York stereotype whose books were like a PSA for type 1 diabetes.

Dawn was a California stereotype who couldn’t make up her mind about which coast she wanted to live on.

Mallory was eleven, completely awkward, a writer, a horse-lover, and the oldest of eight kids. So of course, minus the eight kids part, she was the one I related to the most easily.

Jessi was black! Which they felt the need to mention every chapter! And she was also a ballerina. Who was black!

Abby didn’t show up until about book 90, so a lot of people forget about her. If you need a refresher, she was funny, athletic, and Jewish and had a twin sister, a dead father, and asthma. She also occasionally talked back to Kristy. It only took 90 books for someone to do it.

Together, they baby-sat a lot of cute kids, like the adorable Jamie Newton, Stacey’s “almost-sister” Charlotte Johansson, bratty Jenny Prezzioso, and “walking disaster” Jackie Rodowsky. They wrote about their jobs in the club notebook. They met every Monday, Wednesday, and Friday from 5:30 to 6:00. And they were the best.friends.ever.

God, I loved The Baby-Sitters Club. I read just about every book in the series not once but several times. After awhile, they didn’t even fit on my bookshelves. When I was nine, my entire room was decorated with posters and memorabilia I got from the Baby-Sitters Club fan club. My friends and I dreamed of the day we’d start our own baby-sitters club (of course, it never happened). When the movie came out in 1995, I wore my Baby-Sitters Club T-shirt and hat to the theater on the first day it came out. Actually, my cousins’ aunt, who works for Scholastic, was the executive producer of the movie, and when she got me Ann M. Martin’s autograph when I was ten, it was pretty much the best day of my life at the time.

Yeah, I think you get the picture. I was a huuuuuuuge fan.

Sweet Valley Twins
Sweet Valley High came first, and there was also Sweet Valley Kids, which had the same characters in second grade. But Sweet Valley Twins (later retitled Sweet Valley Twins and Friends, since it wasn’t just about the Wakefields) was the series I read the most. It was centered around the titular twins, Elizabeth and Jessica Wakefield, who were identically blonde and pretty but, of course, polar opposites personality-wise. Elizabeth was the school newspaper editor, had perfect grades, and was obnoxiously self-righteous. Jessica was popularity-obsessed, a member of the Unicorn Club (which was basically a group of popular girls sitting around congratulating themselves on how awesome they were), and obnoxiously self-centered. They were twelve-year-old sixth graders in Sweet Valley, California, which must have one hell of a public transportation system, since these middle schoolers were somehow able to get around by themselves incredibly easily. Speaking of which:

Sleepover Friends
Man, I loved sleepovers as a kid. My mom, who thought they made me tired and cranky, was not such a fan. But what sleepover-loving pre-teen wouldn’t love reading a whole book series about friends who sleep over at each other’s houses every Friday night?

Enter the Sleepover Friends. They were ten-and eleven-year-old fifth graders in Riverhurst, USA, a suburb of “The City,” which was never identified further than that. Lauren, who narrated most of the books (eventually, the other three girls started narrating some of them), was athletic and loved food. Kate was the Kristy Thomas of the group—short, bossy, and would bitch you out if you talked during a movie. Patti, formerly of The City, was the smart, shy one. Stephanie, also formerly of The City, only dressed in red, black, and white because she thought it was cool and probably went on to have an eating disorder, since she was concerned about getting fat even at age ten. They’d get together on Fridays, make food, play Truth or Dare, listen to the radio, make fun of their classmates. And like Sweet Valley, Riverhurst was apparently very easy to get around, because these girls, who weren’t even in middle school yet, seemed to have no trouble going anywhere by themselves without any adults.

The Gymnasts
I used to want to be a gymnast, but not enough to take gymnastics classes. Only enough to do round-offs and one-handed cartwheels on the field at recess and to use the edge of my sandbox like a balance beam. So of course I loved this series, which was about a group of girls on a gymnastics team called the Pinecones at Evergreen Gymnastics Academy (geddit?). It was mainly focused on Lauren, Cindi, Jodi, and Darlene. Lauren was smart but not great at gymnastics, although in the end she turned out to be a good vaulter. Cindi was Lauren’s best friend and was good at the bars. Darlene was the captain, and her dad was a football player nicknamed Big Beef. Jodi was blonde and had a bit of a temper and had a mom who’d recently remarried. The four of them usually took turns narrating the books, except for one that was narrated by Ti An, the youngest member of their team, and two that were narrated by Heidi, an elite gymnast and recovering anorexic they sometimes hung out with. Heidi won an Olympic gold medal in Barcelona in the completely unrealistic series finale. The Pinecones had a really cool coach named Patrick, whom Lauren had a crush on. And let’s not forget about the enemies: Becky, the requisite bitchy girl who was a level higher than the Pinecones; Ashley, the bratty younger Pinecone who never got her own book; and the team’s big rivals, the Atomic Amazons. I remember Lauren always used to preface every statement she made with, “It’s a proven fact.” One of them was, “It’s a proven fact that pigs don’t sweat,” in response to someone using the phrase, “Sweating like a pig.”

Fear Street
R. L. Stine had the Goosebumps series for younger kids, but this was the series I read. Entertainment has never really scared me, and neither did these books, but it’s kind of amazing that these were marketed to pre-teens. There’s no sex in any of them, but there are tons of graphic, bloody murders. All of them took place in Shadyside, USA, which sounds like an ordinary suburb with a ridiculously high crime rate. It’s amazing anyone wanted to live there. Occasionally, there would be small cameos by characters mentioned in another book, but for the most part, every book was about someone different. A lot of them were surprisingly well-plotted—the killer usually turned out to be the least likely person, like the main character’s best friend, or the prom queen candidate who faked her own death and then began killing all the other prom queen candidates because she thought they were trying to steal her boyfriend (seriously). Mostly, they were just murder mysteries, but some were about something supernatural, like cheerleaders getting possessed by an evil spirit, a “ghost from the future” who comes back to try to prevent his own death, or some weird “mind transfer tape” of chanting by some primitive tribe that allowed this guy to possess his girlfriend’s body and make her kill people. I remember there was also a series of books that tried to explain the beginnings of Fear Street, starting in Puritan times when an innocent girl was burned at the stake for witchcraft in a frightening display of historical inaccuracy.

Lurlene McDaniel
This wasn’t a series so much as an author franchise. Lurlene McDaniel wrote a ton of books about teenagers dying of cancer, and when I was about twelve, I couldn’t get enough of these romanticized depictions of illness. They were all so formulaic—if there was a teenage couple, one of them would not survive. If the teenager with cancer survived the book, she probably would die in the sequel, or at least someone close to her would. Lather, rinse, repeat. I’d read these for the same reason I watch The Notebook, but I think also because they helped put middle school problems in perspective.

I remember plenty of other series, complete with the numbers, that I didn’t read too many of. For the little girls dreaming of becoming professional dancers, there was Ballet School for the younger crowd and Satin Slippers for older kids. There was also another series about gymnasts called American Gold Gymnasts, and I think those gymnasts were kids who actually had a shot at the Olympics. And then there was Girl Talk, which was about…a bunch of girls talking? Four girls in a middle school, I think.

There still are, and continue to be, some fabulous children’s and young adult books out there. But it looks like the series section is gone for good. Thanks for the memories.

The 22nd Thing

“25 Things” is the latest Facebook phenomenon. It’s such a simple idea—write down 25 random facts about yourself and tag your friends to do the same. It’s spread so fast that it’s prompted articles in, at least, Time and the Boston Globe, and, of course, some backlash already. It’s gotten to the point where “my twenty-five things” is coming up in casual conversation. But while I agree that it’s a tad self-indulgent, I think it’s fun, and I’ve learned a lot from it. Now all my Facebook friends know that 90s sitcoms are my TV equivalent of comfort food and that, despite not knowing how to sail, I’d like to own a boat someday. And I’ve learned that I have a lot in common with many of my friends. A surprising number of them remember the old PBS shows as fondly as I do (but that’s a subject for another post). I’m not the only person who never gets sick of the view between Charles MGH and Kendall on the Red Line. It also turns out that I have friends who share my affinity for 90s pop, don’t like sandwiches with meat, and even one who’s afraid of geese, and that my sister and I have more in common than I realized.

One thing that people have commented on a lot, though, is my 22nd thing—that I never get bored. People keep telling me what a great thing that is.

But the thing is, it’s both a blessing and a curse. It’s true that I don’t get bored. Even when I was little, I was very good at keeping myself entertained. It’s partly because I enjoy things that tend to be solitary activities, like reading and writing. And as I mentioned in another post, I feel like I don’t have enough hours in the day, so I’ll never run out of things to read or things to write. Even if I do, I don’t mind re-reading old books, or re-watching movies or TV show episodes.

But while I don’t get bored, I do get lonely. Quite a bit, actually. Sometimes I think that my ability to keep myself entertained has prevented me from getting close to people. But it’s a two-way street: I don’t need other people to be entertained, and other people don’t need me.

Unfortunately, I’ve discovered recently that while I’m happy by myself, I’m happier with people around. It’s not like I don’t have friends—I do—but, as I’ve said before, I don’t have anyone who really cares whether or not I’m there. I don’t have anyone who calls me to share good or bad news the moment it happens. On Fridays, people at work will ask me if I have weekend plans and on Mondays, they’ll ask me what I did over the weekend. More often than not, the answer is “nothing.” Or, not nothing, since I was probably writing or watching a movie, but nothing that involved other people.

I think I need to start taking more initiative myself. I have a lot of casual friends that I’d like to be closer to. People always say that it’s better to have a few close friends than a lot of casual ones, and I often feel like I have the latter. But I tend to get anxiety about inviting people to do things. I’ve lost enough friends, either due to the girl drama that tends to happen in school or simply due to time and distance, that I tend to make myself think that people are just pretending to like me. And I’m so horribly awkward that I feel like that’s the only thing that people remember about me.

I don’t want to do another woe-is-me, I’m-alone-again Valentine’s Day entry this year, but I don’t think I’d mind being single so much if I felt like I had friends who needed me. At some point, I might take a job that would take me away from Boston, and it would be so much easier if I had a boyfriend—someone who would go there with me, or, at the very least, miss me a lot. I feel like if I left Boston now, everyone would forget about me, and I’d be alone in a new city. We’d say we’d keep in touch, but even with the best of intentions, people lose touch. It’s happened often enough with me.

Well, I guess this turned into a whiny, woe-is-me post anyway. My apologies. Maybe I’m the only person who has this problem, but if there’s anything 25 Things has taught me, it’s that when you think you’re the only one, you’re probably wrong.

Between the Lines and Behind the Doors

I will eventually post about the election. In fact, I’ll probably post about it three times because I have multiple thoughts on it. But this is something that’s been on my mind that I need to get out, even though I’m tired and need to be getting to bed.

I’ve written about the book The Song Reader before. It’s something I think about a lot, whenever the lyrics of a song keep echoing in my mind. And, as anyone who’s Facebook friends with me knows, lately, the song I’ve been listening to over and over is “Between the Lines” by Sara Bareilles. It’s a song I’d heard before but hadn’t listened to closely until last week. There was a specific situation I applied it to, but then I thought about another situation that was very different but equally applicable.

But then I started thinking about the song in a more universal sense. How many things do we attempt to gain knowledge of by reading between the lines?

I remember reading this article in New York magazine, about how the Internet has caused a generation gap (young people are willing to bear their souls online; their parents aren’t). And after reading it, all I could think was…no one reveals everything online, even to their friends. No one.

Excuse my very cheesy analogy, but the Internet, if you will, is like an extremely large collection of doors. There are the doors that are open to everyone. There are the doors that are locked. There are doors that are locked to most people, but that someone has given you the keys to. And there are doors that are open, but that you probably wouldn’t have found if someone hadn’t led you there.

You could all probably figure out what I meant. We’ve all searched for our own open doors—what people can find out about us by Googling us. We Google ourselves, the people we date, the people we crush on. I sometimes Google my friends just for the hell of it. And we make the most of what we have when we run into a locked door—we see if we have mutual friends with someone whose Facebook profile is private, or check if someone’s posted on someone else’s wall. When someone gives us the key to a door, we read whatever we can into his or her goofy poses in photographs or cryptic Livejournal posts. And if we find our way to an open door we weren’t led to, we feel the need to justify it: “Oh, uh…I found your blog after so-and-so linked to it.”

The thing is, though, you could have access to every bit of information available online about a person and still not know anything important about him. While sometimes in this blog I’m just rambling about TV or whining about the T, sometimes it’s my attempt to be honest and just say what I’m thinking without having to say it out loud—and sometimes hoping that someone will read it and say, “OMG, I know EXACTLY what you mean!!!” (in a less annoying way, of course). But there are so many things I can’t put out there, even in writing, even knowing that this is a door that someone would have to be led to. If years from now, I were to look back on this blog as a record of what I was thinking and feeling at the time, I wouldn’t know the half of what was going on with me. The Internet makes it easier to tell some stories and harder to tell others, and there are some that I would love to be able to tell but know that I never will.

I wonder what people will read between the lines of this entry—or between the lines of my recent obsession with “Between the Lines.” Posting that little Facebook status update reminded me of the days in college when we’d post song lyrics on our AIM away messages, leaving people to read between those lines. The funny thing was that sometimes they read them completely wrong. I remember once, I had the lyrics to “Drive” by Incubus up, and I meant it as a kind of expression of independence and individuality. But my friend Jon saw it and immediately IMed me saying, “What’s wrong?” One person’s anthem of living fearlessly is another’s angry rant.

And to bring this post full-circle, that’s one interesting thing about song reading—the same song can’t mean the same thing to two different people. I recently found this from the author of The Song Reader, which helps you figure out how to read between the lines of your songs. It’s something that might help you figure yourself out when you know that the people reading your vague status updates and cryptic blog posts never will.

If TV Is Bad For You, Why Is There One In Every Hospital Room?

Two reasons to be happy:

1. We got student cable and Internet because my roommates are grad students. So at a really low rate, we have high-speed Internet and more channels than I know what to do with. I’ve never had the premium channels before. Now we have everything! I bet it won’t last, though. It’s probably free On-Demand for a month or something. But I’m enjoying it while we have it. Last week I was watching Bridezillas, and good Lord, that’s an unbelievable show. I can’t believe anyone would ever go on it. Who wants the whole world to know that she made her bridesmaids diet or had a restraining order put out against her after she flipped out at the florist who didn’t show up?

2. The new TV season starts this week!

I should explain something: I love TV. Love it. I wouldn’t call myself a couch potato– I don’t watch that much TV– but the shows I do watch I become obsessed with. I was a big X-Files fan, for instance, and I’m so good at Friends trivia it’s embarrasing. Now I can’t miss an episode of Gilmore Girls, even though it wasn’t as good last season. This year, there are a couple of new shows I want to check out. Here’s what I think I’ll be watching this year:

Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip: That starts tonight. I love Matthew Perry, so I’m glad to see him back on TV. And while I never really watched The West Wing (it was one of those shows I could appreciate for what it was but for some reason never really got into), I do like Aaron Sorkin’s writing.

Gilmore Girls: I hated the long-lost daughter plotline last season, but this is still one of my all-time favorite shows, and Luke and Lorelai are possibly my all-time favorite TV couple. I hope they bring back Marty this year.

Law & Order: SVU: I have to watch this show with my sister. We have all these inside jokes with it. The thing is, you kind of have to make fun of this show (and Ice-T, who cracks me up no matter what he’s saying) or else you actually start thinking about it, and then you say, “Why the hell am I watching this? This is the most depressing show on TV!” I’ll miss Mariska Hargitay, who’s on maternity leave at the beginning of this season, but I love this show for the characters, the plotlines that are twistier than a pretzel, and the potential it has for drinking games (every time Olivia says, “Son of a bitch,” every time Elliot mentions his kids, every “ching ching”).

Six Degrees: This one intrigues me. The six-degrees-of-separation theory is an interesting concept for a show– sounds very J.J. Abrams. I’ll have to check it out.

Desperate Housewives: Now, I do agree that last season wasn’t quite as good as the first one, but it wasn’t that bad. I still enjoyed watching the show, and I can’t wait for next season. Mike better not be dead!

Possibly CSI: I like this show a lot, in no small part due to the characters. But although I missed the season finale, I heard that Grissom and Sara got together or something. I’m completely against that, so I may not watch in protest.

Possibly The O.C.: I’m the only person in the world who started watching this show last year, when it was way past its prime (I know this because I got caught up with the DVDs). But I’m very curious to see what will happen now that the show’s most irritating character, Marissa, is dead. It could either get better (because duh, Marissa’s dead) or worse (because now everyone will be depressed). I don’t know why they had to kill her, though. They could have just had her go off to college somewhere.

I’ll tell you one thing that pisses me off: when people think that abstaining from TV makes them better than you. I think that’s ridiculous. Sure, there are terrible shows like Laguna Beach and One Tree Hill, but there are also movies like From Justin to Kelly and Gigli. But of course, no one thinks they’re superior for not watching movies. Because movies, apparently, are for the cultured among us and TV is for the uncultured. Such crap. TV shows that are done well are just as artful as good movies.

And even bad shows can be entertaining. I mean, take Bridezillas. Stupid, but an entertaining, guilty pleasure. And even American Idol, which I occasionally watch. The cheese factor of that show- especially the final episode- is part of its appeal.

One web site I regularly read and post on is Television Without Pity. The other people who read and post on this site are people who care about TV, and who like to analyze what’s good and bad about the shows they watch. But they are also some of the most intelligent people I have ever talked to, in real life or in the virtual world. They’re not just passionate about TV- they can have in-depth conversations about books, politics, religion, sports, movies, music, education, pop culture, parenting issues, you name it. From talking to them, I’ve learned about things like PhD programs, TV production, living with a disability, Orthodox Judaism, planning a wedding, being a stepparent, and music I’d never listened to before but now love.

It’s kind of ironic that the stereotype of the TV fan is the listless couch potato, because in my experience, the opposite is true. People who get really involved in TV shows tend to be passionate not just about TV, but about whatever they love. Being enthusiastic about a TV show is no different than being enthusiastic about a sports team. No one thinks it’s too weird when someone is obsessed with, say, the Red Sox. But I think most people would be surprised to learn that people who are obsessed enough with a show to discuss it in forums or write fanfic about it have many other interests and passions.

Really, I feel bad for anti-TV snobs. In their determination to look like connoiseurs of high culture, they’ve missed out on many an entertaining hour.